Found something I’ve got wrong? Send the passage.
A useful correction can be quite small. Perhaps the study used a different ingredient, or the result was narrower than I’ve described. I welcome a source that helps put it right. There’s no need to make the case more dramatic than the error itself.
The editorial address
Send source corrections to editors@newagepeptide.com.
Include the page address, the passage and a source that explains what needs changing. A paper’s PubMed identifier or DOI, its publication code, helps locate it. For an FDA statement, the official page and the relevant wording are more useful than someone else’s account of the change.
A sentence about the problem helps, too. Did I name the wrong substance, miss an important limit or describe a result too broadly? Pointing to that difference makes the correction easier to check. You don’t need to review every paper on the subject.
One passage and one relevant source can be enough. Please leave personal medical records out of the message. They aren’t needed to check what a published study found, and this mailbox can’t assess what those records mean for your care.
Small details can change a claim
A study of an ingredient used to make NAD+ isn’t necessarily a study of NAD+ itself. Measuring the body’s own MOTS-c isn’t testing added MOTS-c, and Epithalamin isn’t synthetic epitalon. If a passage loses one of those differences, that’s worth pointing out even when it still sounds plausible.
A newer paper may change just one part of an explanation. Say which part it changes and what it leaves unanswered. I’m happy with a small, accurate correction. It doesn’t have to overturn the whole subject to earn its place.
Sometimes the correction is that we know less than the sentence suggests. A clearer account of uncertainty is useful in its own right. There’s no need to replace an overconfident claim with an equally confident answer in the opposite direction.
Personal care needs a different conversation
New Age Peptide gives no medical advice. This mailbox can’t assess symptoms, interpret personal tests, choose a compound or set a dose. It also can’t arrange prescriptions or products. A healthcare professional who can consider your circumstances is needed for personal treatment questions.
There’s no contact form; email is for correspondence about the guide, and a reply isn’t guaranteed. The references page is a useful place to look for a source already mentioned here. For a treatment decision, these pages remain reading material, however friendly the prose.